Efeito da formulação e da dose de bioestimulantes foliares sobre o desenvolvimento e a qualidade dos frutos de maracujá-doce (Passiflora ligularis Juss.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63804/saastal.v2i2.e1Palavras-chave:
aplicação foliar, bioestimulantes vegetais, culturas andinas, qualidade dos frutos, sólidos solúveis totaisResumo
Os bioestimulantes vegetais constituem uma alternativa promissora para melhorar a eficiência produtiva e a qualidade dos frutos; entretanto, ainda são escassas as informações sobre sua aplicação no maracujá-doce (Passiflora ligularis Juss.). Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da formulação e da dose de dois bioestimulantes foliares sobre o desenvolvimento e a qualidade dos frutos do maracujá-doce em condições andinas. Crop+Plus e Kelan Complex foram avaliados nas concentrações de 0,0; 1,0; 1,5 e 2,0 mL·L⁻¹, utilizando-se um delineamento em blocos completos casualizados, em esquema de parcelas subdivididas. Em cada unidade experimental, foram selecionados dez frutos, cujos diâmetros polar e equatorial foram medidos aos 0, 24 e 50 dias após a primeira aplicação. Na colheita, determinaram-se o conteúdo de sólidos solúveis totais, o peso individual dos frutos e a produtividade estimada com base no peso. Crop+Plus promoveu maior expansão polar e equatorial que Kelan Complex, com efeitos significativos da formulação, do tempo de avaliação e da interação entre ambos. Aos 50 dias, Crop+Plus a 2,0 mL·L⁻¹ apresentou os maiores diâmetros polar e equatorial, de 7,70 e 7,43 cm, respectivamente. Os sólidos solúveis totais foram influenciados pela formulação e pela dose, enquanto a massa dos frutos foi afetada principalmente pela dose. Os melhores resultados foram obtidos com Crop+Plus a 2,0 mL·L⁻¹: 20,90 °Brix, massa média de 120,0 g e produtividade estimada de 6.720 kg·ha⁻¹. Conclui-se que Crop+Plus apresentou os efeitos mais consistentes, sendo 2,0 mL·L⁻¹ a concentração mais promissora no intervalo avaliado.
Referências
S. Araya, A. M. Martins, N. T. V Junqueira, A. M. Costa, F. G. Faleiro, and M. E. Ferreira, “Microsatellite marker development by partial sequencing of the sour passion fruit genome (Passiflora edulis Sims),” BMC Genomics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 549, Dec. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3881-5.
G. Fischer and D. Miranda, “Review on the ecophysiology of important Andean fruits: Passiflora L.,” Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 9471–9481, May 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.91828.
J. C. Carrasco, L. F. L. Palaquibay, and V. Caballero-Serrano, “Fruit characterization of Passiflora ligularis in different Andean regions of Ecuador,” Horticulturae, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1058, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11091058.
F. J. Muñoz-Ordoñez, N. Gutiérrez-Guzmán, M. S. Hernández-Gómez, and J. P. Fernández-Trujillo, “The climactic conditions limit fruit production and quality in gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims f. edulis) under integrated fertilization,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 153, pp. 147–156, Feb. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2022.11.043.
P. Gaona-Gonzaga et al., “Response of sweet passion fruit (Passiflora liguralis Juss) cultivar ‘Colombiana’ to the supply of nitrogen and potassium through fertirrigation,” Manglar, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–82, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2020.012.
G. S. Mattar, C. C. de Moraes, L. M. M. Meletti, and L. F. V. Purquerio, “Accumulation and exportation of nutrients by yellow Passion fruit cv. IAC 275,” Rev. Bras. Frutic., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e178, Jun. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018178.
S. Menegat, A. Ledo, and R. Tirado, “Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 14490, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18773-w.
Y. Wang et al., “Preventing subsoil enhanced nitrification to safeguard agroecosystem sustainability,” Nat. Commun., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 3648, Mar. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70277-7.
P. Quille, J. Kacprzyk, S. O’Connell, and C. K. Y. Ng, “Reducing fertiliser inputs: plant biostimulants as an emerging strategy to improve nutrient use efficiency,” Discover Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 128, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00910-w.
L. Di Sario, P. Boeri, J. T. Matus, and G. A. Pizzio, “Plant biostimulants to enhance abiotic stress resilience in crops,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 26, no. 3, p. 1129, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031129.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products. , L 170, . Unión Europea: Official Journal of the European Union, 2019, pp. 1–114.
M. Baltazar, S. Correia, K. J. Guinan, N. Sujeeth, R. Bragança, and B. Gonçalves, “Recent advances in the molecular effects of biostimulants in plants: An oerview,” Biomolecules, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 1096, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081096.
P. du Jardin, “Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation,” Sci. Hortic., vol. 196, pp. 3–14, Nov. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021.
M. Ruzzi, G. Colla, and Y. Rouphael, “Biostimulants in agriculture II: towards a sustainable future,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, p. 1427283, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1427283.
D. Roche, J. R. Rickson, and M. Pawlett, “Moving towards a mechanistic understanding of biostimulant impacts on soil properties and processes: a semi-systematic review,” Frontiers in Agronomy, vol. 6, p. 1271672, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1271672.
J. Li, T. Van Gerrewey, and D. Geelen, “A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield rffectiveness in field trials,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 13, p. 836702, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702.
J. L. Santos-Jiménez et al., “Passion fruit plants treated with biostimulants induce defense-related and phytohormone-associated genes,” Plant Gene, vol. 30, p. 100357, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2022.100357.
A. M. Orjuela-Rodríguez, J. E. Castilla-Baquero, and H. E. Balaguera-López, “Can biostimulants and grafting alleviate salinity stress in purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims)?,” Agron. Colomb., vol. 42, no. 1, p. e113585, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v42n1.113585.
L. P. Canellas, N. A. Canellas, D. Martinez-Balmori, R. M. Silva, R. C. C. Rosa, and F. L. Olivares, “Farm-produced plant biostimulant: Case study with passion fruit,” Agronomy, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 681, Mar. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030681.
W. Sun, M. H. Shahrajabian, Y. Kuang, and N. Wang, “Amino acids biostimulants and protein hydrolysates in agricultural sciences,” Plants, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 210, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020210.
M. Malécange, R. Sergheraert, B. Teulat, E. Mounier, J. Lothier, and S. Sakr, “Biostimulant properties of protein hydrolysates: Recent advances and future challenges,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 11, p. 9714, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119714.
A. Agosti et al., “Closing the loop in agriculture: Evaluation of the effects of fermented tomato-based biostimulant on Solanum lycopersicum (L.) growth and fruit quality,” Plant Science, vol. 363, p. 112865, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112865.
V. S. Rana et al., “Seaweed extract as a biostimulant agent to enhance the fruit growth, yield, and quality of kiwifruit,” Horticulturae, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 432, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040432.
B. Gonçalves et al., “Biostimulants in fruit crop production: Impacts on growth, yield, and fruit quality,” Horticulturae, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1452, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121452.
H. Y. Dasgan, K. S. Aksu, K. Zikaria, and N. S. Gruda, “Biostimulants enhance the nutritional quality of soilless greenhouse tomatoes,” Plants, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 2587, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182587.
A. Cirillo et al., “Optimizing apricot yield and quality with biostimulant interventions: A comprehensive analysis,” Horticulturae, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 447, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050447.
L. Vultaggio et al., “Joint action of Trichoderma atroviride and a vegetal derived-protein hydrolysate improves performances of woodland strawberry in Italy,” Horticulturae, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 459, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050459.
H. Irani, B. ValizadehKaji, and M. R. Naeini, “Biostimulant-induced drought tolerance in grapevine is associated with physiological and biochemical changes,” Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 5, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-020-00200-9.
A. El Chami et al., “Protein hydrolysates modulate quality traits of tomato fruit under salt stress by regulating the expression patterns of genes related to sugar metabolism,” Horticulturae, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1108, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11091108.
P. Zydlik, Z. Zydlik, and N. E. Kafkas, “The effect of the foliar application of biostimulants in a strawberry field plantation on the yield and quality of fruit, and on the content of health-beneficial substances,” Agronomy, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1786, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081786.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Angy Carpio-Rugel, Johanna Morgan, Grimaneza Moreno-Aldaz
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
